دعوى قضائية تتهم مخططاً احتيالياً للعملات المشفرة بقيمة 207 ألف جنيه إسترليني

دعوى قضائية تتهم مخططاً احتيالياً للعملات المشفرة بقيمة 207 ألف جنيه إسترليني

رؤى رئيسية

  • X news centers on a crypto manipulation lawsuit alleging a £207K احتيال العملات المشفرة.
  • The firm says six principal accounts used repeated posts and engagement.
  • The company seeks repayment, damages, and costs after suspending the accounts.

X has brought two named defendants and unidentified account operators before the UK High Court over accusations of creator revenue fraud. X Internet Unlimited Company and X Corp. allege that Vivek Kumar Sen and Zamyang Sherpa coordinated accounts to manipulate platform engagement.

According to the court filing, the network in question collected a minimum of £207,384 through X’s Creator Revenue Sharing Program. Furthermore, X estimates that investigation and remediation expenses have reached at least £75,000. These claims currently stand as allegations and have not yet been established as judicial findings.

X News Details Crypto Manipulation and Crypto Scam Claims

The legal complaint asserts that the defendants operated multiple accounts as a unified network designed to boost engagement metrics and secure revenue-sharing payouts.

X News: Particulars of Claim | Source: X
X News: Particulars of Claim | Source: X

The court documents state that participants frequently liked, reposted, and interacted with content across connected profiles. X claims these actions were engineered to project an artificial impression of genuine human engagement.

The complaint also notes that several accounts published identical or nearly identical content, with some duplicate messages appearing merely seconds apart.

Within the filing, X points to six primary accounts: @Vivek4real_, @Bitcoin_Teddy, @saylordocs, @TrendingBitcoin, @Kalshibacktest, and @PolyBackTest.

Stripe information links the first three accounts primarily to Vivek Kumar Sen, while connecting the latter three chiefly to Zamyang Sherpa.

Additionally, X alleges the network deployed multiple profiles to mitigate the impact of platform enforcement, ensuring that payouts could continue through alternative accounts if one faced restrictions.

Court Filing Lists Examples of Coordinated Activity

To substantiate its crypto manipulation claims, the complaint outlines several specific instances of coordinated behavior. For example, on October 10, 2025, @TrendingBitcoin and @saylordocs allegedly published matching material within a two-minute window.

X also states that on November 3, four accounts shared the exact same phrase and image within minutes of one another as part of this coordinated strategy.

Another cited instance occurred on August 13, 2026, when X claims that @Vivek4real_, @saylordocs, and @Bitcoin_Teddy replied to the same post within 31 seconds.

The complaint further details that @saylordocs and @PolyBackTest released identical material within minutes on April 20, alongside other matching posts documented across multiple dates in July and August.

Of note, X asserts that @Vivek4real_ and @TrendingBitcoin published highly similar content within an 11-second interval on August 5. The filing additionally lists @BTC_Vibes, @MrSuperBitcoin, and @Laserlump as associated profiles involved in the alleged engagement scheme.

Overall, X maintains that the network utilized likes, replies, and reposts to artificially inflate network engagement and drive revenue payouts.

In response to these activities, X states that the alleged crypto scam amassed at least £207,384 via the Creator Revenue Sharing Program through manufactured engagement.

Furthermore, X calculates its expenses for investigation, analysis, remediation, and prevention to be no less than £75,000. The company is pursuing the return of the disputed funds alongside damages, interest, and legal costs.

Coordinated engagement inflation, duplicate postings, and multi-account manipulation explicitly violate X’s platform policies, which prohibit the artificial amplification of content via likes, reposts, and other metrics.

Records show that X suspended the defendants’ accounts on August 18, 2026, citing coordinated revenue-sharing fraud and platform manipulation.

Ultimately, the legal action demands full repayment of funds, damages, equitable compensation, restitutionary relief, interest, court costs, and any additional remedies the High Court deems appropriate.

الأسئلة الشائعة

What is the X crypto manipulation lawsuit about?

X has filed a UK High Court lawsuit accusing two named individuals and other operators of orchestrating a coordinated network to inflate engagement and fraudulently collect over £207K from the Creator Revenue Sharing Program.

How much money is X seeking to recover?

X is seeking repayment of at least £207,384 obtained through the alleged scam, plus an estimated £75,000 or more in investigation and remediation expenses, alongside damages, interest, and legal costs.

Who are the named defendants in the lawsuit?

The named defendants in the High Court filing are Vivek Kumar Sen and Zamyang Sherpa.

When were the defendants’ accounts suspended?

X suspended the defendants’ accounts on August 18, 2026, for alleged platform manipulation and coordinated revenue-sharing fraud.

هذه ليست نصيحة استثمارية التحليل المنشور هنا هو للمعلومات فقط. الأصول الرقمية متقلبة ويمكن أن تخسر القيمة الكاملة لمركزك. قم ببحثك الخاص قبل اتخاذ أي إجراء.

اترك ردًا

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول المطلوبة معلمة *