主要洞察：
- Celsius 就有争议的 2020 年清算索赔 比特币 4.95 亿美元。
- BitMEX 面临与 6,360 笔交易相关的欺诈和操纵市场指控 BTC.
- 该诉讼在 BitMEX 预定关闭前 11 天提起。
9 月 12 日，Celsius Network 破产清算组在纽约对 BitMEX 实体提起诉讼，寻求追回与 6,360.1666 相关的资产 比特币。起诉书指控该 交易所 运营商在 2020 年 3 月 比特币 崩盘期间存在欺诈、操纵市场以及违规清算行为。
此次法律行动正值 BitMEX 准备于 交易所 9 月 23 日结束运营之际，为一家已在进行业务关停流程的平台相关公司引入了一项新的追偿索赔。
Celsius 诉讼矛头直指 BitMEX 清算系统
9 月 12 日，纽约南区破产法院审理了编号为 26-01091 的对抗性诉讼。代表 Celsius 的实体通过 区块中。">区块链 恢复投资财团（BRIC）提起了这项诉讼，目标指向与 BitMEX 相关的五家公司。
被点名的被告包括 HDR Global Trading Limited、ABS Global Trading Limited、100x Holdings Limited、Shine Effort Inc. Limited 以及 HDR Global Services (Bermuda) Limited。
根据起诉书，BitMEX 在 2020 年 3 月的市场崩盘期间非法扣押了数字资产和 杠杆 仓位的 保证金 不足以抵消亏损时触发。">清算 头寸。破产清算组估计有争议的金额为 6,360.1666 BTC, which was valued at approximately $495 million when the filing was submitted.
These allegations are currently estate claims and have not yet been validated by the bankruptcy court. As proceedings move forward, the defendants retain the right to challenge jurisdiction, liability, damages, and other legal aspects.
Years prior to this official complaint, Celsius had already flagged BitMEX as a potential target for litigation. An October 2023 bankruptcy filing explicitly listed HDR Global Trading under prospective claims of fraud, negligence, and market manipulation.
This earlier disclosure indicates that the new lawsuit did not materialize solely because of BitMEX’s closure announcement. Instead, the lender maintained the prospective dispute throughout its Chapter 11 recovery proceedings.
Celsius Recovery Effort Extends Earlier Bankruptcy Strategy
Court documentation reveals that BRIC assumed its post-bankruptcy responsibilities in January 2024, acquiring the authority to handle 非流动 assets and pursue specific recovery claims aimed at creditor distributions.
Since then, BRIC has advanced several legal actions involving the bankrupt lender’s past counterparties. An October court report noted that the estate successfully settled separate litigation with Tether for $299.5 million in 2025.
The BitMEX case builds upon this recovery strategy by addressing losses connected to derivatives trading, transforming a previously identified potential claim into an active adversary proceeding more than six years later.
市场数据 corroborates that the disputed timeframe aligned with one of the most severe selloffs in 比特币 history. CoinMarketCap reported Bitcoin trading at $5,563.71 on March 13, 2020, marking a 38.92% drop over a seven-day period.
Even so, Celsius blamed its claimed losses on BitMEX’s actions rather than strictly pointing to market volatility. This distinction could prove pivotal in debates concerning causation, liquidation mechanics, and contract terms.
Furthermore, the March 2020 market crash put 杠杆 trading platforms across the entire crypto ecosystem under severe pressure, as swift price drops forced exchanges to execute liquidations while overall liquidity dried up across major trading pairs.
BitMEX Shutdown Moves Ahead Despite Lawsuit
On July 23, BitMEX announced plans to shut down its 交易所 on September 23 at 04:00 UTC. The board of HDR Global Trading attributed this choice to a strategic assessment of its business operations alongside the broader crypto industry.
The company clarified that the shutdown was not prompted by immediate regulatory pressure, hacks, or financial distress. BitMEX also halted new account registrations and advised users to withdraw assets and close out their positions.
The wind-down process accelerated through September, with the exchange setting early settlement for its remaining ETH 作为其原生资产。">以太坊 and Bitcoin 永续 swaps and futures on September 16.
The filing from Celsius did not affect the predetermined shutdown schedule. BitMEX 得到确认 that users could still log into their accounts after trading ceased to withdraw any remaining balances.
This litigation followed another lawsuit that surfaced around the time BitMEX announced its closure. Law firm Burns Charest announced a New York action accusing the platform of fraudulent trading and liquidation practices.
That alternative case features distinct plaintiffs and legal arguments, bringing yet another historical dispute before a judicial body while the exchange concluded its final days of operation.
Legal Process Continues After Sept. 23 Shutdown
Rather than settling the underlying claims, the September 12 complaint merely initiates the adversary proceeding. The court will still need to process procedural motions, responses, and disagreements regarding legal sufficiency or jurisdiction.
Additionally, the defendants retain the option to dispute the calculation of claimed damages and the issue of causation. Any eventual financial recovery will rely on subsequent court rulings, negotiated settlements, or other official resolutions.
BitMEX’s exchange closure remains firmly set for September 23 at 04:00 UTC. Subject to upcoming court instructions, the lawsuit against the corporate defendants is expected to proceed even after trading services have officially ended.
常见问题
- How much is Celsius suing BitMEX for? Celsius is seeking $495 million tied to 6,360.1666 Bitcoin.
- When was the lawsuit filed? The adversary complaint was filed on September 12 in New York.
- Why is BitMEX shutting down? HDR Global Trading’s board cited a strategic review of the business and the wider crypto industry, noting it was not due to financial distress or hacks.
- Did the lawsuit stop the BitMEX shutdown? No, the legal filing did not alter BitMEX’s scheduled shutdown on September 23.
